• What We Do
    • Wealth Counseling
    • Investment Advisory Services
  • Who We Are
    • Our Team
    • Research Roundtable
  • How We Invest
    • Our Fiduciary Pledge
    • Investment Approach
    • Questions To Consider
    • Our Transparent Approach
  • Insights and Research

Insights and Research

Home  »  Performance Measurement • Simplicity   »   Is Top Manager Performance A Random Walk?

Is Top Manager Performance A Random Walk?

By Charlie Henneman, CFA and Preston McSwain, January 27, 2023

Research Roundtable Publication

Many research papers and books have been written about the process that describes and models random movements or a Random Walk.

In the investment world, the most famous version of this may be Burton Malkiel’s seminal publication, A Random Walk Down Wall Street.  First published in 1973, the book details how stock prices seem to follow a random walk, suggesting that a stock’s current price offers no predictive value that would allow investors to consistently beat the market.

This being the 50th anniversary of Malkiel’s Random Walk made us think again about studies that analyze the performance of top investment managers to see whether their results are persistent or random.

In 2017, we published our first piece on research by S&P Dow Jones that analyzes what fund performance data says about the ability of top managers to stay at the top. In what Dow Jones calls their Persistence Scorecard, they found this:

  • No Large-Cap, Mid-Cap, or Small-Cap fund managed to remain in the top quartile at the end of a five-year period.

For those in the asset management business who work hard to outperform an index, this was hard to take, so we looked again at the data at the end of 2021.

Unfortunately, we found this similar finding in the S&P Dow Jones persistence research:

  • No Small-Cap fund remained in the top quartile after five years.

Large-Cap and Mid-Cap funds did improve a little, with 3.5% and 1.5% respectively remaining in the top quartile after five years.  These are still levels, however, that are just at or below random chance odds.

Based on this, we wrote a piece that asserted that active management has revealed itself to be a low probability bet with a big ante. Since hope is not a strategy, we considered the possibility that fiduciaries making allocations to active strategies might be in an uncomfortable position, as they aren’t supposed to be making low probability bets.

We continue to get some pushback on this, so to continue to test our thoughts, we just looked at the numbers again.  This time, we reviewed analysis that encompasses large up markets and then a recent significant down market period ending June 30th 2022.

In looking at this most recent S&P Dow Jones Persistence Report, this is what we found – again:

  • Not a single equity or fixed income manager remained in the top quartile of their respective category peer group over a five-year period.

Based the consistent lack of consistency among top ranked managers, which has been documented repeatedly in S&P Dow Jones Persistence Scorecards, one might say that manager performance can also be viewed as a random walk – except for these important differences:

  • Unlike stock prices, top quartile performance does indeed have predictive value, and the prediction is that the manager will almost certainly underperform in the future.
  • Unlike stocks, a manager charges a fee, whether they outperform or not, compounding the probability or potential fiduciary penalty of manager underperformance.

Studies like we mention are not perfect and one can imagine scenarios where an active management strategy could outperform the market and justify the fees.

After continuing to review the data, however, we appreciate even more the points made by Malkiel.

When recently questioned on CNBC about his index fund strategy recommendation from 50 years ago, Malkiel said this:

“I believe even more strongly than ever that index investing is an optimal strategy and that index funds should constitute the core of everyone’s portfolio.”

We continue to agree.


Related Reading:

Are Selectors Good At Selecting Top Managers?

Say It Ain’t So, Joe

The Simple Alternative – Keeps on Winning

Once Famous

Charlie Henneman, CFA
Website | + posts
  • Charlie Henneman, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/charlie/
    The Simple Alternative
  • Charlie Henneman, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/charlie/
    Is Smart Beta Smart?
  • Charlie Henneman, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/charlie/
    Once Famous?
  • Charlie Henneman, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/charlie/
    Waving Banners - Have Some ESG Managers Lost Their Way?
Preston McSwain
+ posts
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Transparency, Simplicity and Peace of Mind®
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Fiduciary Wealth Partners Reading List
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    If We Had A Chief Economist We Would Have to Pay Them
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Is Trying to Pick Active Managers a Loser's Game?
SHARE
Tags:
Active Management, Index funds, Investing
RELATED ARTICLES
The Road Less Traveled – Simple Alternatives
What may be thought of as a different type of edge – a simple investment alternative.
Is Top Manager Performance A Random Walk?
What the data says at the 50th anniversary of Malkiel's Random Walk Down Wall Street.
Smaller Is Better
Bigger is not better in the money management business and the larger you are as an investor, the harder it is to allocate in a manner that keeps managers small.
All articles

Follow us on social media

Search Our Ideas

Subscribe to Our Posts


Important disclosures

Most Popular

  • The Simple Alternative – Keeps On Winning
  • The Simple Alternative
  • Say It Ain’t So, Joe
  • Are We Baking Portfolios with Bad Ingredients?
  • Crucial Elements in Wealth Management: Simplicity and Transparency

Browse by Theme

  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • Investment Philosophy
  • Managing The Market
  • Peace of Mind
  • Performance Measurement
  • Private Investing
  • Quarterly Letter
  • Simplicity
  • Taxes
  • Transparency
  • Uncategorized
  • Values

FWP Logo Dark

Fiduciary Wealth Partners is a 100% employee owned firm that serves clients in a transparent, fiduciary manner.

We do not have any fee sharing arrangements with managers and do not have any broker-dealer conflicts. In addition, you will never see an arbitration clause in our contracts.

Everything we do is focused on assisting trustees, institutions and families with investment consulting, management and overall asset planning strategies.

  • Disclosures
  • ADV
  • Privacy Policy
  • Form CRS

Useful Links

  • Investment Advisory Services
  • Wealth Counseling
  • Our Team
  • Research Roundtable
  • Our Values
  • Questions To Consider
  • Insights and Ideas
  • Contact Us

Contact us

Phone

(617) 602-1900

Email

info@fwpwealth.com

Address

177 Huntington Avenue
20th Floor
Boston, MA 02115

 

View larger map

© 2020 FWP. All Rights Reserved. Fiduciary Wealth Partners Is An SEC Registered Investment Adviser.