• What We Do
    • Wealth Counseling
    • Investment Advisory Services
    • Family Governance
  • Who We Are
    • Our Team
    • Research Roundtable
    • Our Fiduciary Pledge
  • How We Invest
    • Investment Approach
    • Questions To Consider
  • Insights and Research

Insights and Research

Home  »  Investment Philosophy • Performance Measurement • Transparency   »   Are Selectors Good at Selecting?

Are Selectors Good at Selecting?

By Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA, September 27, 2019

Research Roundtable Publication

There is overwhelming empirical evidence that investment managers struggle to beat their benchmarks.

A large consultant and advisor business exists, however, with the premise that unique skill exists that allows experienced investors to select “best of breed” strategies and outliers that can consistently rank highly among peer groups and outperform indexes.

The big question is:

Are the “selectors” really skilled at identifying the outperforming managers and does their “selecting” add value?

A 2015 study, Picking Winners? Investment Consultants’ Recommendation of Fund Managers, published in the Journal of Finance, attempted to answer this question.

Unfortunately, for many of us who have worked in the field for many years, the answer is brutal:

“No”

After analyzing the recommendations of investment consultants, who at the time represented 90% of the institutional U.S. manager selection market, researchers found no statistically significant evidence that funds recommended by the consultants outperformed funds not recommended by the same consultants.

In conclusion, they stated this:

“The search for winners, encouraged and guided by investment consultants, is fruitless.”

Another blow to both the open architecture manager selection business has now been published by the Critical Review of Finance titled Fund of Funds Selection of Mutual Funds.

In the study, the authors scrutinized the universe of “fund of funds managers.”

Often, these managers select investment strategies within their fund families, which is a potential conflict of interest.

As the paper mentions, though, this also gives these “selectors” a privileged position in terms of what is really going on inside portfolio management teams (insider information in a good way).

Despite the privileged position, researchers found this:

Fund of funds managers select funds that significantly underperform a random selection of mutual funds.

Based on all of this, the next question might be:

Do these selectors influence investors?

Big time.

According to Jenkinson et al. (2015), a fund that is recommended by the consultants in the sample receives a staggering $2.4 billion in additional inflows when compared to a fund that does not receive consultant recommendations.

Considering that the evidence seems to be clear that many, if not most, active fund recommendations don’t add value, why do investors continue to put so much emphasis on hiring manager picking consultants?

The answer might be found again in academic research.

In Money Doctors, a study published in the Journal of Finance in 2014, the authors present a model where financial advice is a service comparable to the practice of medicine.

As the authors wrote:

“In our view, financial advice is a service, similar to medicine. We believe, contrary to what is presumed in the standard finance model, that many investors have very little idea of how to invest, just as patients have a very limited idea of how to be treated.”

“Just as doctors guide patients toward treatment, and are trusted by patients even when providing routine advice identical to that of other doctors… money doctors… that help investors make risky investments and are trusted.”

In other words, investors place a great deal of faith in the recommendations of their money doctor advisors and consultants.

And, in a follow-on CEPR, Trust and Delegated Investing: A Money Doctors Experiment, researchers found that “investors are willing to take substantially more risk when a money manager is [viewed as being] more trustworthy.”

Related to this trust, unfortunately, Money Doctors also found that due to biases in their beliefs and profit margin conflicts, managers often “do not correct misperceptions.”

In our view, when a high level of trust exists, especially related to someone’s physical or fiscal well-being, professionals of any type have a high level of responsibility to be transparent.

Based on this, should consultants and advisors in the industry be more open as it relates to what the evidence says about our ability, or lack thereof, to consistently find managers that add value over simple index funds?

We think so.

 


Related Reading:

Trillions of Influence – Elisabetta Basilico and Preston McSwain – 2019

Trust and Delegated Investing: A Money Doctor Experient – Maximilian Germann, Benjamin Loss, Martin Weber – 2018

Fund of Funds Selection of Mutual Funds – Edwin J. Elton, Martin J. Gruber, Andre de Souza – 2017

Say It Ain’t So, Joe – Preston McSwain – 2017

Picking Winners? Investment Consultants’ Recommendation of Fund Managers – Tim Jenkinson, Howard Jones, Jose Vicente Martinez – 2013

On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance – Mark M. Carhart – Journal of Finance – 2012

Money Doctors – Nicola Gennaioli, Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny – Chicago Booth Research Paper – 2012

Luck Versus Skill in the Cross-Section of Mutual Fund Returns – Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French – Journal of Finance – 2010

Challenge to Judgment – Paul A. Samuelson – Journal of Portfolio Management – Fall 1997

Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA
Website | + posts
  • Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/elisabetta/
    Do Index Funds Make Active Funds Better?
  • Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/elisabetta/
    Trillions of Influence
  • Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/elisabetta/
    Do The Kingmakers Have Clothes?
  • Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/elisabetta/
    Waving Banners - Have Some ESG Managers Lost Their Way?
SHARE
Tags:
Active Management, Index funds, Investing
RELATED ARTICLES
Recessions – What Should Investors Do?
The evidence may surprise you.
Trillions – Our Talk With Robin Wigglesworth About Index Funds
It seems like we have been continuing to have the same debates over and over for almost 100 years.
Should We Be Tactical?
We should be open and humble about our tactical ability to add value.
All articles

Follow us on social media

Search Our Ideas

Subscribe to Our Posts


Important disclosures

Most Popular

  • The Simple Alternative – Keeps On Winning
  • The Simple Alternative
  • Say It Ain’t So, Joe
  • Are We Baking Portfolios with Bad Ingredients?
  • Crucial Elements in Wealth Management: Simplicity and Transparency

Browse by Theme

  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • Investment Philosophy
  • Managing The Market
  • Peace of Mind
  • Performance Measurement
  • Private Investing
  • Quarterly Letter
  • Simplicity
  • Taxes
  • Transparency
  • Uncategorized
  • Values

FWP Logo Dark

Fiduciary Wealth Partners is a 100% employee owned firm that serves clients in a transparent, fiduciary manner.

We do not have any fee sharing arrangements with managers and do not have any broker-dealer conflicts. In addition, you will never see an arbitration clause in our contracts.

Everything we do is focused on assisting trustees, institutions and families with investment consulting, management and overall asset planning strategies.

  • Disclosures
  • ADV
  • Privacy Policy
  • Form CRS

Useful Links

  • Investment Advisory Services
  • Wealth Counseling
  • Our Team
  • Research Roundtable
  • Our Values
  • Questions To Consider
  • Insights and Ideas
  • Contact Us

Contact us

Phone

(617) 602-1900

Email

info@fwpwealth.com

Address

177 Huntington Avenue
20th Floor
Boston, MA 02115

 

View larger map

© 2020 FWP. All Rights Reserved. Fiduciary Wealth Partners Is An SEC Registered Investment Adviser.