• What We Do
    • Wealth Counseling
    • Investment Advisory Services
  • Who We Are
    • Our Team
    • Research Roundtable
  • How We Invest
    • Our Fiduciary Pledge
    • Investment Approach
    • Questions To Consider
    • Our Transparent Approach
  • Insights and Research

Insights and Research

Home  »  Performance Measurement • Simplicity • Transparency   »   Will the Real Alphas Stand Up?

Will the Real Alphas Stand Up?

By Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA and Preston McSwain, October 16, 2023

Just the mention of Alpha gets neurons firing in the investment world, conjuring up the following synonyms:

“Winner – Outperformer – Dominance”

This post is not all about Alpha synonyms, though.

It is a follow-up to a piece we wrote a few years ago, which encouraged more of us to admit that, “even though we throw around language like we grew up in Athens” it can be All Greek to Us.

To hopefully help bring transparency into how some of the Greek terms we use are defined, we are diving deeper into what investment Alpha is, is not, and some issues for investors and the industry to consider.

First, repeat after us…

Alpha Is Not Outperformance

We can already hear some bristling at this, but we think it is important to mention, especially related to how investment Alpha can be presented and the calls to action it can invoke.

As an example of why we put our statement above in bold, and how talk about Alpha can be more than it may seem to some, below is a recreation of a chart we received not long ago from a fund company. It was sent with this anchoring marketing line:

“A compelling record of consistent Alpha generation.”

In fact checking the manager’s presentation using analysis software from MPI, and what the manager stated was their best fit benchmark (more on this later), we found their Alpha claims to be accurate.

We also found this chart to be correct, however, which the manager didn’t include in their marketing materials.

The same manager that promoted consistent Alpha generation, consistently underperformed their stated benchmark, the S&P 500, over the past 3, 5, 7 and 10 years for the period ending June 30, 2023.

How these two charts can be accurate, brings us to this…

What Alpha Is

We are going to spare you more Greek in the form of a quantitative asset-pricing model but, in short, Alpha is a relative risk-adjusted measurement of performance, not pure outperformance.

The reason why Alpha can be positive in the first chart while Excess Returns are negative in the second one lies in the complexities of formulas that can be used to calculate Alpha (yes, more than one calculation method exists and it is worth asking which is being used, as they can produce different results).

What one might call the “Underperforming Alpha” we have illustrated can also be the result of Bungled Benchmarking (the selection of a “best fit” benchmark or factor that is not a good representation of the manager’s investment style) or due to other measurement issues we touched on when we previously asked this question – Are We Baking With Bad Ingredients?

Back to the original pitch we started with, if an investor understood all of what we’ve mentioned when receiving the manager’s “consistent Alpha generation” call to action and invested based on this knowledge, all good – maybe the manager was the correct fit based on their objectives.

If they didn’t, though, might the call to Alpha have driven an untended action – an investment in a manager that had consistently underperformed their stated benchmark?

What Could Improve

In writing this piece, we are not suggesting that the manager we highlighted above did anything that was non-compliant (detailed disclosures and definitions of various terms existed in fine print at the back of the presentation).

In addition, we’re not making any statements about Alpha’s usefulness. It’s a helpful metric and manager evaluation tool.

What we are touching on is something we think can improve not only investor outcomes but also improve the industry – plain language.

Our hope is that this post will spark a little more debate about all the Greek we speak and encourage everyone to be more focused on educating investors using more easily understandable terms.

Along the lines of the title of this piece, we’ll simply end with this question:

Will more of the Alphas in the investment world stand up and spend more of their alpha energy focusing on transparency and simple language?

We hope so.


Related Reading:

A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model – Journal of Financial Economics – Fama and French

How to Calculate Three-Factor Alpha – Alpha Architect – Wes Gray

Bungled Benchmarking – Fiduciary Wealth Partners – Preston McSwain

What’s It All About – Alpha? – Oaktree – Howard Marks

Are We Baking With Bad Ingredients? – Fiduciary Wealth Partners – Tommi Johnsen, PhD

Transparency – Do We Protest It Too Much? – CFA Institute – Preston McSwain

Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA
Website | + posts
  • Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/elisabetta/
    Are Selectors Good at Selecting?
  • Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/elisabetta/
    Do Index Funds Make Active Funds Better?
  • Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/elisabetta/
    Bungled Benchmarking
  • Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/elisabetta/
    Trillions of Influence
Preston McSwain
+ posts
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Transparency, Simplicity and Peace of Mind®
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Fiduciary Wealth Partners Reading List
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    If We Had A Chief Economist We Would Have to Pay Them
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Is Trying to Pick Active Managers a Loser's Game?
SHARE
Tags:
Active Management, Alpha, Investing
RELATED ARTICLES
Emerging Markets – Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?
Is potential to extract some EM juice worth it?
The Road Less Traveled – Simple Alternatives
A different type of edge – a simple investment alternative.
Beware of Sharpe Objects
When Sharpe Ratio presentations look too good, it pays to ask sharp questions.
All articles

Follow us on social media

Search Our Ideas

Subscribe to Our Posts


Important disclosures

Most Popular

  • The Simple Alternative
  • Say It Ain’t So, Joe
  • Are We Baking Portfolios with Bad Ingredients?
  • Crucial Elements in Wealth Management: Simplicity and Transparency
  • Questioning the Illiquidity Premium

Browse by Theme

  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • Investment Philosophy
  • Managing The Market
  • Peace of Mind
  • Performance Measurement
  • Private Investing
  • Quarterly Letter
  • Simplicity
  • Taxes
  • Transparency
  • Uncategorized
  • Values

FWP Logo Dark

Fiduciary Wealth Partners is a 100% employee owned firm that serves clients in a transparent, fiduciary manner.

We do not have any fee sharing arrangements with managers and do not have any broker-dealer conflicts. In addition, you will never see an arbitration clause in our contracts.

Everything we do is focused on assisting trustees, institutions and families with investment consulting, management and overall asset planning strategies.

  • Disclosures
  • ADV
  • Privacy Policy
  • Form CRS

Useful Links

  • Investment Advisory Services
  • Wealth Counseling
  • Our Team
  • Research Roundtable
  • Our Values
  • Questions To Consider
  • Insights and Ideas
  • Contact Us

Contact us

Phone

(617) 602-1900

Email

info@fwpwealth.com

Address

2310 Washington Street
3rd Floor
Newton, MA 02462

 

View larger map

© 2020 FWP. All Rights Reserved. Fiduciary Wealth Partners Is An SEC Registered Investment Adviser.