• What We Do
    • Wealth Counseling
    • Investment Advisory Services
    • Family Governance
  • Who We Are
    • Our Team
    • Research Roundtable
    • Our Fiduciary Pledge
  • How We Invest
    • Investment Approach
    • Questions To Consider
  • Insights and Research

Insights and Research

Home  »  Investment Philosophy • Managing The Market • Quarterly Letter   »   Recessions – What Should Investors Do?

Recessions – What Should Investors Do?

By Preston McSwain, July 12, 2022

Recession talk is dominating the news and investment commentary.

What should investors do?

Below are thoughts from our recent quarter end letter that may help.

The evidence about how markets have performed during these periods may surprise you.


As we wrote at about this time in mid-2020, intra-day market swings have been dominating the news and market commentary.

U.S. and global equity markets have dropped approximately 20% year-to-date, which essentially matches the large pullbacks we saw in the first quarter of 2020 and, before that, in the last quarter of 2018.

We start with this look in the rearview mirror to highlight that, even though the catalysts differ, market drops of 10-20% are reasonably common.  As an example, the chart below illustrates that a correction (10% drop), bear market (20% drop), or recession (generally defined as two quarters of negative GDP growth) happens approximately every two years.

We are not mentioning this to dismiss or suggest that the drops in both equities and bonds aren’t significant – they are.  As we have experienced in many other downturns, however, we are just staying mindful that market headlines can often make drops seem abnormal.

The Normal is that markets frequently go up and down in a manner that can be unnerving to everyone.

We wish we could confidently forecast what lies ahead for the market and the economy, but we have never met or heard of an investment professional who can.  One of my favorite reminders of this comes from “A Spectacular Zero”, a research report written by a statistician a few years ago.  The paper showed that Wall Street consensus estimates have historically had a 0% success rate in predicting a market downturn in advance.

Along these lines, much of the talk recently has been about Federal Reserve Board members and their forecasts, especially related to interest rates and the possibility of a recession.

Unfortunately, similar to Wall Street analysts, the predictive power of most past, and some still present, Federal Reserve governors also leaves much to be desired.  As the chart below illustrates, with the exception of Janet Yellen, the overall accuracy of Fed Governor forecasts has been well below 50%, with the majority below 25%.

While no one can predict the future, what we can do is remain disciplined and stay focused on the evidence as to where opportunities may lie to produce attractive long-term returns.

As we just mentioned, even though few if any are successful at calling downturns before they happen, our experience in navigating past downturns is that when the word “recession” starts to seep into market discourse and is actually “called” by the government, it has consistently been a time to resist the negative news that follows.

To retest our thinking on this, we recently dove deeper into the performance of markets after a recession announcement.  The chart below illustrates what we found.

Bottom line, the government body that calls recessions, the NBER, has consistently been late.  The solid lines show the date of each trough announcement (the “calling” of a recession), atop a graph showing the total return of the S&P 500.  Government calls have not been at the absolute bottom each time, but they are remarkably close, a degree of inaccuracy that the Fed has acknowledged in its market research:

“[Our forecast] errors were enormous in the severe recessions… and business cycle turning points.” – Federal Reserve – 1992

“The forecast did not anticipate the Great Recession that started in December 2007” – Federal Reserve – 2015

In quantifying the data, we found that, on average, if one were to have bought on the date the NBER announced that the economy was in a recession, the forward-looking 12-month return was north of 16%.  Ironically, the converse has also been true.  After the NBER has announced that a recession is over, a researcher that we collaborate with, Joachim Klement, found that the market has tended to drop slightly.

Based on this, we are staying focused on long-term trends – trends showing that, despite corrections, bear markets, and recessions about every two years, the S&P 500 has been positive approximately 80% of the time on a calendar year basis, producing an average annualized return of almost 13% (see the chart below updated through June 30, 2022).

With such high probabilities of high positive calendar year returns, even amongst dips, and such low probabilities of correctly calling a turn, even by the Federal Reserve, which receives data in advance of the market, we continue to stay anchored on our process of trimming positions if they have grown too large and buying if the market has taken portfolios too far out of balance with policy targets.

We will not always rebalance at the optimal moment, but by sticking to our process, we think we will remain in a good position to add value with reasonable levels of risk.


Related Reading:

What To Do About…

The Normal

Keep A Steady Hand

Preston McSwain
+ posts
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Transparency, Simplicity and Peace of Mind®
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Fiduciary Wealth Partners Reading List
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    If We Had A Chief Economist We Would Have to Pay Them
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Is Trying to Pick Active Managers a Loser's Game?
SHARE
Tags:
Forecasting, Investing, Recession
RELATED ARTICLES
Recessions – What Should Investors Do?
The evidence may surprise you.
Trillions – Our Talk With Robin Wigglesworth About Index Funds
It seems like we have been continuing to have the same debates over and over for almost 100 years.
Should We Be Tactical?
We should be open and humble about our tactical ability to add value.
All articles

Follow us on social media

Search Our Ideas

Subscribe to Our Posts


Important disclosures

Most Popular

  • The Simple Alternative – Keeps On Winning
  • The Simple Alternative
  • Say It Ain’t So, Joe
  • Are We Baking Portfolios with Bad Ingredients?
  • Crucial Elements in Wealth Management: Simplicity and Transparency

Browse by Theme

  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • Investment Philosophy
  • Managing The Market
  • Peace of Mind
  • Performance Measurement
  • Private Investing
  • Quarterly Letter
  • Simplicity
  • Taxes
  • Transparency
  • Uncategorized
  • Values

FWP Logo Dark

Fiduciary Wealth Partners is a 100% employee owned firm that serves clients in a transparent, fiduciary manner.

We do not have any fee sharing arrangements with managers and do not have any broker-dealer conflicts. In addition, you will never see an arbitration clause in our contracts.

Everything we do is focused on assisting trustees, institutions and families with investment consulting, management and overall asset planning strategies.

  • Disclosures
  • ADV
  • Privacy Policy
  • Form CRS

Useful Links

  • Investment Advisory Services
  • Wealth Counseling
  • Our Team
  • Research Roundtable
  • Our Values
  • Questions To Consider
  • Insights and Ideas
  • Contact Us

Contact us

Phone

(617) 602-1900

Email

info@fwpwealth.com

Address

177 Huntington Avenue
20th Floor
Boston, MA 02115

 

View larger map

© 2020 FWP. All Rights Reserved. Fiduciary Wealth Partners Is An SEC Registered Investment Adviser.