• What We Do
    • Our Services
    • Wealth Counseling
    • Investment Advisory Services
    • Family Governance
  • Who We Are
    • Our Professionals
    • Research Roundtable
  • Our Values
    • Our Fiduciary Pledge
    • Values and Community
  • How We Invest
    • Our Investment Approach
    • Questions To Consider
  • Insights and Ideas
  • Contact Us

Insights and Ideas

Home  »  Performance Measurement • Private Investing • Transparency   »   The Triumph of Hope Over Experience ?

The Triumph of Hope Over Experience ?

By Oliver Binette, CAIA and Preston McSwain, November 1, 2019

Many investors are increasing allocations to Venture Capital and other types of Private Investments.

Large investors are saying that “we need more of it, and we need it now” and some in Washington are suggesting that individual investors are missing out.

Before investing, though, investors might benefit from spending a little time on reports like ones from the Kauffman Foundation, outlining their 20 year history in Venture Capital, and a more recent report from the State of Oregon, which has been investing in Private Equity in scale since the early 1980s.

This what they found.

Kauffman Foundation Venture Capital Results

  • Only twenty of 100 venture funds generated returns that beat a public-market equivalent by more than 3 percent annually, and half of those began investing prior to 1995.
  • The majority of funds – sixty-two out of 100 – failed to exceed returns available from the public markets, after fees and carry were paid.
  • Only four of thirty venture capital funds with committed capital of more than $400 million delivered returns better than those available from a publicly traded small cap common stock index.
  • Of eighty-eight venture funds in our sample, sixty-six failed to deliver expected venture rates of return in the first twenty-seven months (prior to serial fundraises).
  • The cumulative effect of fees, carry, and the uneven nature of venture investing ultimately left us with sixty-nine funds (78 percent) that did not achieve returns sufficient to reward us for patient, expensive, long-term investing.

 Kauffman Foundation Investment Committee Findings 

  • Large LPs must invest in very large funds to put their allocated capital to work, yet big VC funds most often fail to generate market-beating returns
  • Investment decisions made based on seductive narratives such as vintage year and quartile performance, which rely heavily on internal rate of return measures that often are misleading and aren’t persistent over time.
  • Many VC funds last longer than ten years—up to fifteen years or more. We have eight VC funds in our portfolio that are more than fifteen years old.
  • Venture Capital returns haven’t significantly outperformed the public market since the late 1990s
  • Since 1997, less cash has been returned to investors than has been invested in VC.

State of Oregon Private Equity Portfolio Review

  • Private Equity has produced results broadly consistent with domestic public market indices over the past decade
  • The asset class has not generated anything close to the 250-500bps of target excess return over public equities for an extended period of time
    • That level of excess return would have required nearly perfect fund selection or material fee reduction in all vintage years since 2005
  • Key industry trends that gained momentum in 2017 and over the last decade… represent an increase in scale, competition, and complexity for LPs (investors)

Some private investment opportunities have provided investors with solid returns, and we aren’t suggesting that investors shouldn’t keep an eye out for outlier opportunities.

The cover page of the Kauffman report states this, however, related to their Triumph Of Hope Over Experience and lessons learned from investing hundreds of millions into Venture Capital or private Growth Equity funds:

“We Have Met The Enemy…  And He Is Us.”

Based on all the excitement and money “gushing into private capital funds,” is this often the case?

We think so.

 


Related Reading:

Kaufman Foundation Venture Capital Report – 2012

State of Oregon Investment Committee Review – 2018

Six Myths About Venture Capital – Harvard Business Review – 2013

Private Equity Presentations: Are Some Tall Tales? – CFA Institute – 2017

Persistence That Just Ain’t So – CFA Institute –  2018

Private Allocations: Are We Baking with the Bad Ingredients? – FWP Research Roundtable – 2019

oliver-binette
Oliver Binette, CAIA
Website
    This author does not have any more posts.
Preston McSwain
+ posts
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Transparency, Simplicity and Peace of Mind®
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Fiduciary Wealth Partners Reading List
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    If We Had A Chief Economist We Would Have to Pay Them
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Is Trying to Pick Active Managers a Loser's Game?
SHARE
Tags:
Investing, Private Equity, Transparency
RELATED ARTICLES
Bungled Benchmarking
When comparing different types of investments, check to make sure apples are not oranges.
Do Index Funds Make Active Funds Better?
Research suggests index investing makes active managers better.
The Triumph of Hope Over Experience ?
Before investing more in Venture Capital and Private Equity, would investors be wise to spend more time on reports like these?
All articles

Follow us on social media

Search Our Ideas

Sign Up

Sign up to receive our latest insights and ideas.

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Fiduciary Wealth Partners, 177 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, http://www.fwp.partners/. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Important disclosures

Most Popular

  • Say It Ain’t So, Joe
  • You Can Keep It Simple
  • Crucial Elements in Wealth Management: Simplicity and Transparency
  • Are We Baking Portfolios with Bad Ingredients?
  • Do You Need to Join the Endowment Club?
  • Fallible Forecasts?

Browse by Theme

  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • Investment Philosophy
  • Managing The Market
  • Peace of Mind
  • Performance Measurement
  • Private Investing
  • Simplicity
  • Taxes
  • Transparency
  • Uncategorized
  • Values

FWP Logo Dark

Fiduciary Wealth Partners is a 100% employee owned firm that serves clients in a transparent, fiduciary manner.

We do not have any fee sharing arrangements with managers and do not have any broker-dealer conflicts. In addition, you will never see an arbitration clause in our contracts.

Everything we do is focused on assisting trustees, institutions and families with investment consulting, management and overall asset planning strategies.

  • Disclosures
  • ADV
  • Privacy Policy
  • Form CRS

Useful Links

  • Investment Advisory Services
  • Wealth Counseling
  • Our Professionals
  • Research Roundtable
  • Our Values
  • Questions To Consider
  • Insights and Ideas
  • Contact Us

Contact us

Phone

(617) 602-1900

Email

info@fwpwealth.com

Address

177 Huntington Avenue
20th Floor
Boston, MA 02115

 

View larger map

© 2020 FWP. All Rights Reserved. Fiduciary Wealth Partners Is An SEC Registered Investment Adviser.