• What We Do
    • Wealth Counseling
    • Investment Advisory Services
  • Who We Are
    • Our Team
    • Research Roundtable
  • How We Invest
    • Our Fiduciary Pledge
    • Investment Approach
    • Questions To Consider
    • Our Transparent Approach
  • Insights and Research

Insights and Research

Home  »  Performance Measurement • Transparency   »   Beware of Sharpe Objects

Beware of Sharpe Objects

By Preston McSwain and Tommi Johnsen, PhD, August 16, 2024

One of the most widely used metrics used to evaluate and pitch investment portfolios and managers was developed by the Nobel Prize researcher, William “Bill” Sharpe.

Coined the Sharpe Ratio, it is meant to offer investors a way to compare the performance of investment strategies to one another on a risk adjusted basis.  As Bill Sharpe once said, we agree that when “properly used, it can improve investment management.”

As with many things, the key word in this phrase is “properly.”

As we recently wrote about Alpha pitches, unfortunately, we commonly see presentations of Sharpe ratios that aren’t that sharp.

Before we offer our views, let’s start with a reminder from Sharpe himself from a 2023 interview:

“Very often, [investment] consultant[s] or manager[s] will show you Sharpe ratios for every investment in the portfolio, this fund, that fund, etc.

That doesn’t really help you much with what it was originally intended for.”

Before continuing, let that sink in a little.

Even though it is common to see investment advisers compare the Sharpe Ratios of investment funds inside a portfolio to one another, it was not intended to be used this way.

What’s Not Proper

Either inside or outside the investment world, if a case is being made for one product versus another, it is important that proper comparisons are made.  If not, it may be appropriate to discard them all together.

As a quick cheat sheet on when it may be good to move on, the following is a list of Sharpe ratio comparisons that may be improper, with issues to consider below each bullet point:

  • Hedge Funds to Public Funds
    • The correlation and pricing of each strategy may not match
  • Hedge Funds to Hedge Funds
    • The correlation and pricing of each strategy may not match
  • Private Funds to Most Any Other Type of Investment
    • The correlation and pricing of each strategy may not match

Note that every sub-bullet is the same.  It is important that metrics match or, as is more commonly said, apples are being compared to apples.

Common Problems

To make sure that Sharpe Ratio pitches aren’t improperly mixing things up, below are a few issues to watch for.

First, beware of presentations suggesting that a portfolio of high Sharpe Ratio managers will result in a high Sharpe Ratio portfolio.  We would have to dive much deeper into investment geek speak to get this all in but in short, if the return streams of each manager are not highly correlated to one another, the comparisons are not apples to apples and the presentation should be discarded.

Next, another issue that commonly creates improper comparisons can be found in the Sharpe Ratio formula.

A key input is the variability of manager returns or standard deviation of the return streams.

If the frequency of the return marks or calculation periods do not match, the standard deviation metrics used to calculate each manager’s Sharpe Ratio will not match and, again, the comparison should be discarded.

An example of this can be the comparison of a daily priced public fund manager to a hedge fund or private investment that may only be priced once a month, once a quarter or even less, when capital statements are distributed.

This apples to orange mismatch of how either the return or risk side of the Sharpe Ratio equation is marked has become so common that it now has its own Cliff Asness of AQR coined phrase, Volatility Laundering, which can trend on Twitter.

A Sharpe Edge

As we said at the start of this post, when properly applied, the Sharpe Ratio can be a useful tool.

This ratio is often sold as the key definitive metric, though, so we are just offering a few thoughts to consider that we hope will provide investors with an edge.

When a Sharpe Ratio looks a little too good or is being pitched a little too hard, it can pay to ask sharp questions.


Related Reading:

The Ratio that Broke Investors’ Brains – Institutional Investor

The Sharpe Ratio – Stanford University – William Sharpe

Is Your Sharpe Ratio Lying to You? – QuantPy

Preston McSwain
+ posts
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Transparency, Simplicity and Peace of Mind®
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Fiduciary Wealth Partners Reading List
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    If We Had A Chief Economist We Would Have to Pay Them
  • Preston McSwain
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/preston/
    Is Trying to Pick Active Managers a Loser's Game?
Tommi Johnsen, PhD
Website | + posts
  • Tommi Johnsen, PhD
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/tommi/
    Are We Baking Portfolios with Bad Ingredients?
  • Tommi Johnsen, PhD
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/tommi/
    What Needs to Change?
  • Tommi Johnsen, PhD
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/tommi/
    Waving Banners - Have Some ESG Managers Lost Their Way?
  • Tommi Johnsen, PhD
    https://fwpwealth.com/author/tommi/
    Questioning the Illiquidity Premium
SHARE
Tags:
Investing, Transparency, Wall Street
RELATED ARTICLES
Emerging Markets – Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?
Is potential to extract some EM juice worth it?
The Road Less Traveled – Simple Alternatives
A different type of edge – a simple investment alternative.
Beware of Sharpe Objects
When Sharpe Ratio presentations look too good, it pays to ask sharp questions.
All articles

Follow us on social media

Search Our Ideas

Subscribe to Our Posts


Important disclosures

Most Popular

  • The Simple Alternative
  • Say It Ain’t So, Joe
  • Are We Baking Portfolios with Bad Ingredients?
  • Crucial Elements in Wealth Management: Simplicity and Transparency
  • Questioning the Illiquidity Premium

Browse by Theme

  • Fees
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • Investment Philosophy
  • Managing The Market
  • Peace of Mind
  • Performance Measurement
  • Private Investing
  • Quarterly Letter
  • Simplicity
  • Taxes
  • Transparency
  • Uncategorized
  • Values

FWP Logo Dark

Fiduciary Wealth Partners is a 100% employee owned firm that serves clients in a transparent, fiduciary manner.

We do not have any fee sharing arrangements with managers and do not have any broker-dealer conflicts. In addition, you will never see an arbitration clause in our contracts.

Everything we do is focused on assisting trustees, institutions and families with investment consulting, management and overall asset planning strategies.

  • Disclosures
  • ADV
  • Privacy Policy
  • Form CRS

Useful Links

  • Investment Advisory Services
  • Wealth Counseling
  • Our Team
  • Research Roundtable
  • Our Values
  • Questions To Consider
  • Insights and Ideas
  • Contact Us

Contact us

Phone

(617) 602-1900

Email

info@fwpwealth.com

Address

2310 Washington Street
3rd Floor
Newton, MA 02462

 

View larger map

© 2020 FWP. All Rights Reserved. Fiduciary Wealth Partners Is An SEC Registered Investment Adviser.